Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > --- a/kernel/module.c > +++ b/kernel/module.c > @@ -3058,8 +3064,25 @@ static int do_init_module(struct module > blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list, > MODULE_STATE_LIVE, mod); > > - /* We need to finish all async code before the module init sequence is done */ > - async_synchronize_full(); Linus put async_synchronize_full() here as a fix but beware: you can start using the module before this call. Normally the potential caller is the one requesting the module load so it works, but if we get more async stuff we may land in that hole. Changing every caller of any async-initializing service is not going to be pretty, but maybe put an async_cookie_t in struct module for module_init to use, and sync it in try_module_get()? Which would now need a can_sleep flag... but the result would be more async. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
