Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:57:13AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 11/13/2012 11:37 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > ok good. Unfortunately I have already sent this merge window's pull > > request to Greg so I'd have to delay this until v3.9. If that's ok with > > you, I can take it through my tree. > > I hoped that this can go with 3.8 since in 3.9 I'm planning to remove all of > these TWL4030_MODULE_* defines which have TWL_MODULE_* counterpart. > In this case I will introduce dummy defines to point to the correct place for > the USB in 3.9 and we can get rid of the rest of these in 3.10. Oh well. This > is going to take a bit longer than I have anticipated. > I can't think of any other subsytem this can go through... Let's ask if Greg could take this patch directly without going through me. Greg, would it be ok to take this single patch without going through me? Or would you prefer if I made another tag just for this single patch ? cheers -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
