On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:39:28PM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:00:23 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote : > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Anisse Astier wrote: > > > > > > How about matching any BIOS from Lucid, regardless of the board name? > > > > > > I was just being conservative. Lucid is a common english word, and you > > > never know how another company could name their BIOS. Or maybe pegatron > > > could decide to fix their BIOS on different boards. > > > > > > I personally have no objection if you think it won't step on other > > > people's toes. > > > > Heh, I have no idea. If you have a device with a Lucid BIOS then > > you're closer to the problem than I am. :-) > > > > My feeling is to go with your revised patch. If it turns out later > > that some Lucid BIOSes do need the handoff, the code can be changed > > then. > > Ok, let's go. I doubt pegatron would provide an update anyway on a 2 years > old hardware, and we'll see about other vendors. As this is only referring to a specific board, I don't have a problem changing the check in this manner. I'll go apply this patch now. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
