On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:00:23 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote : > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Anisse Astier wrote: > > > > How about matching any BIOS from Lucid, regardless of the board name? > > > > I was just being conservative. Lucid is a common english word, and you > > never know how another company could name their BIOS. Or maybe pegatron > > could decide to fix their BIOS on different boards. > > > > I personally have no objection if you think it won't step on other > > people's toes. > > Heh, I have no idea. If you have a device with a Lucid BIOS then > you're closer to the problem than I am. :-) > > My feeling is to go with your revised patch. If it turns out later > that some Lucid BIOSes do need the handoff, the code can be changed > then. Ok, let's go. I doubt pegatron would provide an update anyway on a 2 years old hardware, and we'll see about other vendors. Greg? -- Anisse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
