On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:16:25PM +0300, Kustaa Nyholm wrote: > On 24.9.2012 21.47, "Greg KH" <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >And if I'm going to be forced to change my program, and libusbx has now > >shown that they don't care about their public api, well, I might as well > >just rewrite it to remove that dependancy completly, as it's obvious > >they don't know how to treat their users. > > Really Greg, > > I think you are overreacting and talking through your hat. > > If you bothered to check the archives you'd see how much the developers > actually care about their users. Um, breaking existing applications is not indicative of that, don't you agree? > If you think rewriting to remove that dependency makes more sense > than applying a trivial fix Pete promised to deliver, go ahead, > especially if you think that is what *your* users will want. No one delivered any such "fix", all I got was a bunch of bug reports this morning from the distros saying that usbutils was suddenly broken. That shows that libusbx is really the problem here, and that maybe I shouldn't depend on it anymore. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
