Re: [RFC] Documentation update for Isochronous URB handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 14 September 2012 09:52:47 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > Pratyush, since you have been busily working on related issues for the
> > > dwc3, you might be interested in this too.
> > 
> > Thanks for including me in CC. Whatever knowledge I have for the host
> > software, this proposition seems correct to me.
> 
> Okay, good.  I was hoping you could make sure that the dwc3 driver
> implements the new behavior.
> 
> > Do you think that similar flag make sense in gadget framework too?
> > Currently, gadget driver does not impose any restrictions on when to
> > transmit a request by hardware, so peripheral driver always schedule as
> > per its own criteria.
> 
> That's an excellent question.  I really don't know the answer.  It
> should be discussed with gadget authors who use isochronous endpoints
> in their drivers.  Also, Felipe might have some ideas.

The UVC gadget driver uses isochronous transfers, but doesn't care about which 
frame URBs will be transferred. If there was an ASAP flag the driver would set 
it.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux