On Monday 10 September 2012 08:37:55 Florian Wöhrl wrote: > Am 10.09.2012 04:55, schrieb Oliver Neukum: > > On Monday 10 September 2012 10:51:32 Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> On Monday 10 September 2012 10:11:15 Bjørn Mork wrote: > >>>>> And I do not think ftdi_sio should be loaded for this device > >>>>> since it is really not an FTDI device after all. 04d8:000a is > >>>>> a CDC-ACM demo device from Microchip's USB Firmware > >>>>> Framework. > >>>> Yes, that is cleary an error which should be fixed. Microchip owns the > >>>> vid and has AFAIK reserved that pid for single function CDC ACM devices. > >>> If this thing at least uses the vendor specific class, we should be able to > >>> deal with both. Remember that we don't want to punish users for a vendor's > >>> stupidity. > >> Sure. But we don't know that, do we? I have not seen any descriptor > >> dump/extract from the offending device. Just the undocumented "add more > >> identifiers". We can of course change it to a vendor class match, > >> hoping that will work. Should I do that instead of deleting the entry? > > Yes. > Hi Oliver, > > it seems like cdc_acm was altered, too - am I right? modinfo doesn't > mention 04d8:000A. It just tells 04d8:000B. Did you make that patch? DOesn't the device show the proper classes in the interface descriptors? Why do you want a specific match? Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
