On Monday 10 September 2012 10:51:32 Bjørn Mork wrote: > Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Monday 10 September 2012 10:11:15 Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> > And I do not think ftdi_sio should be loaded for this device > >> > since it is really not an FTDI device after all. 04d8:000a is > >> > a CDC-ACM demo device from Microchip's USB Firmware > >> > Framework. > >> > >> Yes, that is cleary an error which should be fixed. Microchip owns the > >> vid and has AFAIK reserved that pid for single function CDC ACM devices. > > > > If this thing at least uses the vendor specific class, we should be able to > > deal with both. Remember that we don't want to punish users for a vendor's > > stupidity. > > Sure. But we don't know that, do we? I have not seen any descriptor > dump/extract from the offending device. Just the undocumented "add more > identifiers". We can of course change it to a vendor class match, > hoping that will work. Should I do that instead of deleting the entry? Yes. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
