On 08/23/2012 10:18 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
On 08/23/2012 09:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:16 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
This issue could be resolved in a different way: Have you followed the
discussion at linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 2012-08-20,
Subject "i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions"? If nothing unexpected turns
out, PNX4008 should probably be removed altogether. (Practically
abandoned arch for 6 years.) Easily possible for v3.7.
Ach. I assumed that is being merged. The PNX arch does not define
USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI so I goes that you can't select it there?
Yes, this issue will be gone also.
Then, the resulting solution is much simpler and Sebastian's patch
obsolete.
That would be what?
Well, your idea won't be obsolete completely. :-) But much simpler
without all the "PNX4008 || LPC32XX" stuff. Following Alan's proposal,
I'd prefer not introducing new symbols, and much of the "PNX4008 ||
LPC32XX" logic won't be necessary anymore.
For the PNX4008 removal - should I already post a patch to build the
respective changes on top of, without PNX4008 references?
If nobody cares about PNX4008 and nobody tested if it actually works in
the OHCI mode I don't see the point in keeping it around especially if
there are rumors to remove the arch.
It would be nice, if you could manage to compile this thingy without
I2C. In the end one could attach something different than isp1301, no?
So I think, in the perfect world you would probe for your phy and
notice that it is not there and print a message: "Dude! Select isp1301
for OHCI, aight?!"
Thanks,
Roland
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
