On 08/23/2012 09:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 08/23/2012 12:16 AM, Roland Stigge wrote: >> This issue could be resolved in a different way: Have you followed the >> discussion at linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 2012-08-20, >> Subject "i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions"? If nothing unexpected turns >> out, PNX4008 should probably be removed altogether. (Practically >> abandoned arch for 6 years.) Easily possible for v3.7. > > Ach. I assumed that is being merged. The PNX arch does not define > USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI so I goes that you can't select it there? Yes, this issue will be gone also. >> Then, the resulting solution is much simpler and Sebastian's patch >> obsolete. > > That would be what? Well, your idea won't be obsolete completely. :-) But much simpler without all the "PNX4008 || LPC32XX" stuff. Following Alan's proposal, I'd prefer not introducing new symbols, and much of the "PNX4008 || LPC32XX" logic won't be necessary anymore. For the PNX4008 removal - should I already post a patch to build the respective changes on top of, without PNX4008 references? Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
