> On 08/20/2012 01:47 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: >> Would it make sense to instead of doing that, wrap composite_setup() and >> composite_disconnect() inside ifdef and make ccg.c define those two >> functions? Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I hoped you suggest to move ccg's dependencies into staging. > Why would want to move the ifdef into composite? ccg calls both > functions so it would give two ifdefs instead one central and I think > it would get more ugly. Ah, sorry, disregard my comment. I've misread the ccg.c code. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Attachment:
pgpe0t3URX44K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
