On Friday 17 August 2012 13:11:30 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:23:15PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > No, you are right. If the command EP was closed and the URB submission then it > > > will retry over and over again. > > > > Well, what remedy would you suggest? > > I just noticed some of my patches here got reverted. Do you have any hardware > or did you just stumble over it? I have just my target UAS gadgetâ?¦ No hardware. Do you have suggestions where to get hardware? > I know Sarah posted a while ago (year or so) a series where USB-anchor were > used to keep track of URBs. > Actually I have no idea why there is this workqueue at all. There is either a > permanent error or a temporary error like -ENOMEM where *I* think you should > give the system a moment to breath. So clean up your requests queue and say > no, can't do but maybe later. It is possible that you get -ENOMEM while a command is already being executed. The worst case is probably that you got a command to the device and you need to do autosense, but you get -ENOMEM. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
