> > > > > OK, now, I have understood you, do you think below are correct? > > > > - drivers/usb/otg renames to drivers/usb/phy > > - Both USB PHY driver (PHY function supplier) and USB PHY User (like > msm_otg.c, > > fsl_otg.c, mv_otg.c, twl6030-usb.c) will be at drivers/usb/phy. > > - msm_otg.c, fsl_otg.c mv_otg.c renames to msm_usb.c, fsl_usb.c, and > mv_usb.c. > > these little guys don't seem to be using the PHY, they seem to *be* the > PHY driver. See that msm_otg.c calls usb_set_transceiver(). That's a phy > driver. Other than that, it's all good. > In fact, some like msm_otg.c, it implements PHY driver at msm_otg.c, and also use this PHY driver at msm_otg.c. For some users, they may be confused why the drivers implements dual-role function at the folder of drivers/usb/phy. I suggest we only move the pure PHY driver like: ulpi.c, ulpi_viewpoint.c to drivers/usb/phy/ at usb-next tree currently. Or you think we just move all files (except otg_fsm.c and otg_fsm.h) at drivers/usb/otg/ to drivers/usb/phy/ (at usd-next tree) now? > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
