On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:41:54PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:18:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > > Maybe... but that'll, again, mean loads of per-board data to associate > > > both devices. If everybody was using DT, we could just use phandles :-p > > > > > > Then again, when we want to have a kernel-wide generic PHY layer (not > > > USB PHY layer, but generic), we will have waaaaay too much data to > > > associate PHYs with their specific Links. > > > > Just like you said just now, there are much things to do for PHY Layer (or > > kernel-side generic PHY), so we need step by step. Does you agree we move > > USB PHY related things to drivers/usb/phy first? > > Sure, that makes sense. But what will drivers/usb/otg become ? Wouldn't > it be better to just rename that directory instead ? That's holding PHY > drivers anyway. drivers/usb/otg will be only for otg driver, like current xxx_otg.c, and command otg file in future. As we have decided to separate PHY from OTG, it is better to put two things at two different folders. > > -- > balbi -- Best Regards, Peter Chen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
