On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:18:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Maybe... but that'll, again, mean loads of per-board data to associate > both devices. If everybody was using DT, we could just use phandles :-p > > Then again, when we want to have a kernel-wide generic PHY layer (not > USB PHY layer, but generic), we will have waaaaay too much data to > associate PHYs with their specific Links. Just like you said just now, there are much things to do for PHY Layer (or kernel-side generic PHY), so we need step by step. Does you agree we move USB PHY related things to drivers/usb/phy first? > > -- > balbi -- Best Regards, Peter Chen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
