On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:53:58AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:04:02 +0200 > Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Exactly. that's I want. No more SoC vendor specific drivers codes. > > > Okay it seems you have plan or no objection for merging dwc2 codes > > > if it's acceptable for mainline. > > > > sure, if it's clean, reusable and compiles on all arches I have no > > objection. Specially if it also helps removing duplicated code from > > the tree :-) > > > > > Before that it needs to discuss the original author of dwc2 patches > > > how to improve or/and co-work for mainlining. > > > > that would be great. Thanks for taking that task so quickly :-) > > Hi Felipe, > > The HSOTG is for the dwc2. > > I think, that it is doable to turn it to the dwc2 driver in a way > similar to the dwc3 driver. > > Moreover when compared to e.g: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/53892/match=marri > the HSOTG is in my opinion simpler. I have similar thoughts, indeed :-) > I will prepare the dwc2 driver basing on the current HSOTG driver. Thanks :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
