On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:20:48PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:15:58AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This was on top of Stephen's patch, which I didn't apply, so I just
> > > > edited it to do what you wanted it to.
> > >
> > > Not on top of Stephen's patch, but on top of the one I submitted ("USB:
> > > serial: fix console error reporting") and which could be back-ported
> > > more easily. I mentioned this in the first mail in the series.
> > >
> > > If you apply this one first, there will be no warning (and no need for
> > > hand editing).
> > >
> > > (If you skip the first patch, then you must make sure that the first
> > > argument to dev_err_console is "port" rather than "&port->dev").
> >
> > Ick, I missed that, as I dropped that patch because I thought this
> > superseeded it. Or I think I did, can you check my tree and send
> > whatever I need to fix this up?
>
> Here's a resend of the remaining three patches which apply on top of usb-next
> (which now already contains the fourth macro patch).
>
> I decided to keep the split fix for the generic driver so that the minimal
> first patch (USB: serial: fix console error reporting) can be applied to the
> stable trees once 3.3 is out.
Thanks, now applied.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
