On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:23:47PM -0500, Gregs git-bot wrote: > commit: c1084a56da255ef5385c0f587e16fdc225a5460f > From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:19:38 +0200 > Subject: usb: otg: kill langwell_otg driver > > The way this driver was added by f0ae849 (usb: Add Intel Langwell USB > OTG Transceiver Driver) never even compiled together with langwell_udc, > and that's the only way for it to be useful. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v2.6.31+ > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/otg/Kconfig | 14 - > drivers/usb/otg/Makefile | 1 - > drivers/usb/otg/langwell_otg.c | 2347 -------------------------------------- > include/linux/usb/langwell_otg.h | 139 --- > 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2501 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/usb/otg/langwell_otg.c > delete mode 100644 include/linux/usb/langwell_otg.h Now I'm all for deleting code, but why is this -stable material? It doesn't build in the older kernels, so why even worry about it? So, unless someone objects, I'm going to ignore this, and the other otg langwell patch that was requested for stable. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
