On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:59:20PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > One more question before I make the v9. If you have two PHYs but only > > > one of the is OTG, how do you make sure the other PHY driver can not > > > take advantage of OTG utility? > > > > We have been thinking about adding a phy_type kinda thing, or maybe a > > "features" flag ?!? > > I don't know. To me it would be more clear to keep the phy and otg > separate for now. Can we leave it for now, and fix it in the second > round? Sure, go ahead. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
