Hi,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:27:58AM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> > index 2f5c299..3441738 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> > @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@
> > #define VBUS_DET BIT(2)
> >
> > struct twl6030_usb {
> > - struct usb_phy otg;
> > + struct usb_phy phy;
> > + struct usb_otg otg;
> I see otg being added to twl6030_usb (changes from v7). Whats the
> reason behind this?
> I think its better to have it in the way you had in v7.
Felipe felt there is no reason for the drivers to need to allocate the
structure. That is why I changed it.
Br,
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
