Hi Greg, On 11/4/2011 9:13 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:55:09PM +0530, Pavan Kondeti wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am working on adding USB device tree support for MSM platform. One of >> our chip set has 2 hsusb cores. The first core is configured as otg and >> the other core is configured in host only mode (EHCI compliant). Are the >> below device node names Okay? Please suggest. > > Why do you need to name the speed of the device and the host? That > doesn't really matter if you plug a low-speed device into that super > speed host controller, right? > Right :-) > I'm not familiar with device tree naming conventions, but is this > something you do for network devices? If not, I'd not recommend it for > USB controllers either. > I am also not sure about the label names. The reason I would like to have them in device tree source file is just for readability. One can easily correlates the device node properties with the label. Say if I want to change the IRQ number or some property value of 1st instance HSUSB device controller (while porting a different board), I look for hsusb0-device. Thanks, Pavan -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
