On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:55:09PM +0530, Pavan Kondeti wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I am working on adding USB device tree support for MSM platform. One of >>> our chip set has 2 hsusb cores. The first core is configured as otg and >>> the other core is configured in host only mode (EHCI compliant). Are the >>> below device node names Okay? Please suggest. >> >> Why do you need to name the speed of the device and the host? That >> doesn't really matter if you plug a low-speed device into that super >> speed host controller, right? >> >> I'm not familiar with device tree naming conventions, but is this >> something you do for network devices? If not, I'd not recommend it for >> USB controllers either. > > I'd like to comment, but I wasn't cc'd on the original email so I > don't know what is being proposed. Pavan, can you please resend your > question and cc devicetree-discuss and me? Oops, never mind. I see that it got hung up in the mailing list. I'll clear it now. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
