On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:55:09PM +0530, Pavan Kondeti wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am working on adding USB device tree support for MSM platform. One of >> our chip set has 2 hsusb cores. The first core is configured as otg and >> the other core is configured in host only mode (EHCI compliant). Are the >> below device node names Okay? Please suggest. > > Why do you need to name the speed of the device and the host? That > doesn't really matter if you plug a low-speed device into that super > speed host controller, right? > > I'm not familiar with device tree naming conventions, but is this > something you do for network devices? If not, I'd not recommend it for > USB controllers either. I'd like to comment, but I wasn't cc'd on the original email so I don't know what is being proposed. Pavan, can you please resend your question and cc devicetree-discuss and me? thanks, g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
