On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > > From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 7:24 AM > > > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > For anyone willing to go through a talk with USB-IF, the email for > > > USB30CV complaints is ssusbcompliance@xxxxxxx > > > > Paul, you have the CV program and the results of the test. Would you > > like to file a complaint? > > > > If you prefer, send the test output to me and I'll file a complaint. > > > > Alan Stern > > Hmm. My copy of the BOT spec (admittedly very old) says that the host > "shall" issue a request with wLength=1. Exactly. It says what the host shall do, not what the device shall do. > So I think testing that the > device rejects an invalid request from the host can be construed as > valid. It does fail the "be strict in what you send, and lenient in > what you receive" principle, though. But I have no strong objection > to the test. > > But if you feel strongly about it, I can rerun the test and send you > the test report. Yes, please. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
