Re: xhci_hcd fails to load with acpi=off

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:46:18PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/29/11 11:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:44:26PM +0200, Christian Schaubschläger wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Enabling ACPI is not an option for me in that case.
> >>> Why not?
> >>
> >> Well, the reason is the following:
> >> After starting the linux system I switch back the machine to real mode
> >> using the kexec system call (then I run some real/protected mode stuff).
> >> This works fine in most cases, but on some machines after kexec the
> >> machine is in a state where important things (eg. some bios interrupt
> >> calls) don't work any more. The reason for that is that the machine's
> >> interrupt controller/pci system/chipset is left in an 'unusable' state
> >> by the ACPI system...
> >>
> >> Disabling ACPI solved this issue on almost all machines; however,
> >> recently I had to deal with some machines with usb3, and on some of them
> >> I observed the behaviour I described before.
> >>
> >> Now I'm aware that this is not the typical usage scenario of a linux
> >> system, and I'm also aware that another option to get things working in
> >> real mode again would be trying to re-configure (or reset) the hardware
> >> after kexec; but this is not a trivial thing to do; for me it would be
> >> easiest to have xhci working without ACPI. That's why I was asking.
> > 
> > Again, this isn't a xhci issue, ACPI is in charge of handling the PCI
> > irq routing here, so it is needed to have the pci devices work properly.
> > 
> > I suggest you work with the Linux ACPI developers to solve your problem,
> > and that will then resolve the xhci issue as well.
> 
> so (for arch/x86/Kconfig), this:
> 
> config PCI
> 	bool "PCI support"
> 	default y
> 	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI if (X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_IO_APIC)
> 
> should also say:
> 	select ACPI
> or
> 	depends on ACPI
> 
> I hope not.

No, but for this motherboard, it looks like yes, ACPI is required to get
PCI interrupt routing correct.  It's been that way for a few years now
on a lot of different boards, nothing new here at all.

> I do think it would be worthwhile to discuss this (xhci) problem
> with the kexec people.

I think it would make more sense to discuss the acpi issue with the
kexec people...

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux