Le Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:35:15 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
>
> > This allow to clean duplicated code in most of SOC driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
> > b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c index f8030ee..f990b0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
> > @@ -763,6 +763,35 @@ static int ehci_run (struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int __maybe_unused ehci_setup (struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> > +{
> > + struct ehci_hcd *ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
> > + int retval;
>
> ...
>
> > +}
> > +
>
> Instead of putting this routine in ehci-hcd.c, where it will silently
> use up unnecessary codespace on thousands or millions of desktop
> systems, why not put it into a new separate source file? Then the
> SOC drivers can #include that file.
Ok if you prefer that.
But if we allow someday to built more than one
SOC driver at a time (this will come for distribution doing generic arm
kernel or case like [1]). How it will work ?
Also because the function is static, the compiler will remove
it, if it is not used. So it won't use extra codespace on desktop.
Matthieu
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=130831671316362&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
