Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
index 2cd9a60..875eb75 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
@@ -250,6 +250,18 @@ static int dr_controller_setup(struct fsl_udc *udc)
portctrl |= PORTSCX_PTW_16BIT;
/* fall through */
case FSL_USB2_PHY_UTMI:
+#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_SOC_BOOKE)
Why is this BOOK-E specific? Doesn't this apply to others as well since it is the same core?
[Ramneek]: Others (like 83xx) have different bits involved for UTMI bringup...
Below code is specific to BOOK-E socs having internal USB UTMI phy
I see. Can't you read this from OF instead of #ifdefs how the UTMI should
be done?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
