On Monday 20 June 2011 19:39:34 Alexander Holler wrote: > That packed without an additional aligned() caused errors on ARM with > gcc 4.6 is another problem which got (currently) fixed by removing packed. Packed caused errors because it is *wrong*. The code as it was used undefined behavior in the language. > But this introduces imho doubts and uncertainty about if padding bytes > could be between the members, therefore I would prefer to use packed > with aligned instead of removing the packed. Packing was never an issue here, please stop talking about it. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
