On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 20 June 2011 19:39:34 Alexander Holler wrote: > > That packed without an additional aligned() caused errors on ARM with > > gcc 4.6 is another problem which got (currently) fixed by removing packed. > > Packed caused errors because it is *wrong*. The code as it was used undefined > behavior in the language. I wouldn't call this issue as such, but this is a Red herring. Could you please provide a pointer to the structure definition so a second opinion to the usefulness of __packed there could be provided? If it is not matching any of the fairly limited cases where having __packed is relevant then we can just confirm that it should go. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
