Re: [RFC 2/4] Intel xhci: Support EHCI/xHCI port switching.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:52:20PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:33:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 May 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 
> > > > And the USB-IF gives us MAJOR crap[1] about Linux developers
> > > > participating in the specification work, yet other operating systems
> > > > require horrible hardware hacks like this in order just to have them to
> > > > work with their platforms.
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > [1] They just kicked some Linux kernel developers out of a working group
> > > > for a new USB device specification because they don't trust us to abide
> > > > by the legal agreements we signed.  If I was a paranoid person, I would
> > > > think that some company was out to get us because we showed them up
> > > > again with USB support first-to-market.
> > > 
> > > Is there any hope of improving matters by filing a formal complaint?
> > 
> > Well, it would probably just get reviewed by the USB-IF board of
> > directors, which basically consists of members from companies who pay
> > the most money to get on the board.  HP, Intel, LSI, Microsoft, Rensas
> > (formerly NEC), and ST-Ericsson.  All big companies with sort of a split
> > personality when it comes to Linux support, with the exception of one.
> > I think we'd have to get some allies within those companies to speak to
> > the USB-IF board members first for our compliant to be heard.
> 
> Okay, there may be barriers, but will it hurt to try?  Or is it really 
> a case of outside developers not being allowed because they are neither 
> employees of nor contractors with the USB-IF member companies?  I can 
> understand the board not wanting to allow that.

That's the given reason.  The USB-IF membership form says that only
employees or contractors can participate.  But I think they only require
that because, legally, there is no retribution method for a member
company to pursue if their non-employee does something like leak draft
specs.  If they're not employees, you can't fire them or anything.  That
goes back to Greg's comment about the USB-IF thinking non-employees are
harder to bind to the Linux Foundation's legal agreement.

Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux