Re: [linux-pm] xHCI and suspend/resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011, Dwight Schauer wrote:
>> > >> > >> >> >> >> On Thursday, May 12, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >> >> >> >> > For new readers: The problem is that an xHCI USB host controller does
>> > >> > >> >> >> >> > not wake up a suspended system properly.
>> > >> > ...
>> > >> > >> > So, clearly, you don't get any PCIe PME interrupts from root ports
>> > >> > >> > when the keyboard is plugged in.  Without those interrupts the runtime
>> > >> > >> > resume of xhci won't work.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > Please attach the output of "lspci -vv" with "auto" in the (suspended) xhci's
>> > >> > >> > power/control file before and after you've plugged in the keyboard.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> > >> > Rafael
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> The lspci -vv before, after, and diff are attached.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > This means that the PME signaled by the xHCI doesn't cause the PMEStatus bit
>> > >> > > in its root port to be set, which is why the root port doesn't generate
>> > >> > > interrupts.  This seriously looks like a hardware bug and the only thing
>> > >> > > we could do to work around it would be to poll the xHCI for the PME status
>> > >> > > periodically (while suspended).
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Can you see if the feature works after booting with pcie_ports=compat in
>> > >> > > the kernel command line?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Rafael
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I'll try that on Monday (the pcie_ports=compat kernel option).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Well, I've got 2 different systems (one Intel and one AMD based, both
>> > >> > exhibit the same behavior).
>> > >>
>> > >> Are both xHCI controllers from NEC?
>> > >>
>> > >> > I have a few other systems I can try it on as well on Monday.
>> > >>
>> > >> Please do if possible.
>> > >
>> > > If pcie_ports=compat doesn't help, does it help if you use pci=nomsi?
>> > > I'm wondering if the hardware bug shows up only when MSI or MSI-X is
>> > > enabled for the NEC hardware.  Also, if you turn on
>> > > CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD_DEBUGGING, what NEC firmware version do you see in
>> > > dmesg?
>> > >
>> > > Sarah Sharp
>> > >
>> >
>> > pcie_ports=compat had no effect
>> > with pci_=nomsi I get upon boot.
>> >
>> > xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: Failed to enable MSI-X
>> > xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: failed to allocate MSI entry
>> > xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: Failed to enable MSI-X
>> > xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: failed to allocate MSI entry
>> >
>> > The 6:00.0 is for NEC device in the PCIe slot.
>> >
>> > With pci_=nomsi the rutime power management works, I can put auto in
>> > power/control and the device comes back on it's own.
>> >
>> > However, this does not address the wakeup from system suspend issue,
>> > enabled in power/wakeup still does not work. If the interrupt is now
>> > being polled, that would make sense as to why it still does not work.
>> >
>> > For TI's xHCI device I get "xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: failed to allocate
>> > MSI entry" with pci=nomsi.
>> >
>> > The system with TI's device in it is exhibiting the same symptoms
>> > (wakeup does not work and by default auto in power/control does not
>> > work). It is a different motherboard and chip-set than the system I
>> > have the NEC device in.
>> >
>> > pci=nomsi has no effect on the system with the TI xHCI device in it.
>> > pcie_ports=compat had no effect either as far as making auto in
>> > power/control work properly.
>> >
>> >
>> > As to the NEC firmware, both the on-board and off-board NEC devices
>> > have the same version:
>> >
>> > xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: NEC firmware version 30.21
>> > xhci_hcd 0000:06:00.0: NEC firmware version 30.21
>> >
>> > Attached are the dmesg boot logs for both systems.
>>
>> OK, so for the S3 issue, I think there's a problem with the PCIe link
>> on these devices such that the link is not present during resume
>> and that's why commands are not reaching the device.  I'm not sure yet
>> what to do about it, but I wonder if xhci_hcd does something around
>> PCIe links on suspend?
>
> It doesn't seem so.
>
> Dwight, can you comment out the pci_disable_device(pci_dev); in
> drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c and see if that makes a difference?
>
> Rafael

I just tried that, but it has no effect on wakeup from S3.

Dwight
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux