On Sunday 24 April 2011 02:00:31 Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 07:29:03PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Saturday 23 April 2011 17:11:20 Greg KH wrote: > > > > I guess some more people will fill in details on this thread when > > > > they are back from easter vacation, CC'ed, and submit a patch to > > > > fix this issue. > > > > > > Why can't you send a patch based on the change of the above mentioned > > > #define? > > > > Hi, > > > > Please find attached a patch for review. > > > > Happy easter! > > > > --HPS > > > > From 85c24c9c0be6a1aad3adcf7f4fdbe653e5f692e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@xxxxxxx> > > Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:20:41 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] The default maximum transmit length for NCM USB frames > > should be so that a short packet happens at the end if the device > > supports a length greater than the defined maximum. This is achieved by > > adding 4 bytes to the maximum length so that the existing logic can fit > > a short packet there. > > Ah, the fun of git where if you forget to put a blank line after your > first line of the changelog, it all gets smushed into the subject line. > That's not your fault. > > But I do need a signed-off-by line for this. > What should I put as signed-off-by ? --HPS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
