On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:29:34PM +0000, Matthieu Castet wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:12:04AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Any comments/ideas? > > > > the problem today is that we don't have an abstraction layer on top of > > UDCs, there's only the agreement that UDC drivers will export > > usb_gadget_probe_driver() and usb_gadget_unregister_driver(), that's > > all. > > > > We need a real abstraction layer to do that, I started implementing > > one but unfortunately got preempted by next-silicon tasks, so I had > > to stop. You can still find the branch in my gitorious tree[1] for > > reference > Is that the udc class stuff, or it is different things ? > > I neither find time to resubmit my multi udc stuff (waiting better udc > support) : it is better than nothing. That's the UDC Class. I thought your multi-udc support had been accepted :-( I was planning on rebasing udc class on top of that. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
