> Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:12:04AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Any comments/ideas? > > the problem today is that we don't have an abstraction layer on top of > UDCs, there's only the agreement that UDC drivers will export > usb_gadget_probe_driver() and usb_gadget_unregister_driver(), that's > all. > > We need a real abstraction layer to do that, I started implementing > one but unfortunately got preempted by next-silicon tasks, so I had > to stop. You can still find the branch in my gitorious tree[1] for > reference Is that the udc class stuff, or it is different things ? I neither find time to resubmit my multi udc stuff (waiting better udc support) : it is better than nothing. Matthieu-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
