Alan Stern writes: > > The main difference between the two files is that the .good run sets > the baud rate to 9600 and the .bad run sets it to 115200. There's also > a difference later on; the .good file shows three '!' characters being > sent to and read back from the device whereas the .bad file shows no > corresponding I/O. > The the 3 '!' characters in the good output is the write script actually working. > > I don't know the reason for the difference in baud rates. Did both > machines have the same version of the kernel and the same Perl program > file? > Yes, the software involved on both machines is identical. -- Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
