Re: Performance comparison of same device in Linux and Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I don't know anything about the internals of hdparm, and you can read
> the man page as well as I can.

When I looked into the man page it says –write-sector to write zeros
into the specified sector.  The same man page says that NOT to use
this option. That is the reason I am asking here.

> What version of Linux are you using?
I am using the 2.6.32 and 2.6.32-rc6 which are checked out from Sarah Sharp git

>And which scheduler?
CFQ.

>Some people have found that the default scheduler (CFQ) leads to worse I/O
> performance than other schedulers.  See
> https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2010-January/004970.html

This link says low performance occurs for copyng of multiple files.
But I am always testing with single large ZIP / TAR files. Still low
performance

Thanks in Advance,
RD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux