Re: Performance comparison of same device in Linux and Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Ramya Desai wrote:

> > I don't know anything about the internals of hdparm, and you can read
> > the man page as well as I can.
> 
> When I looked into the man page it says ?write-sector to write zeros
> into the specified sector.  The same man page says that NOT to use
> this option. That is the reason I am asking here.
> 
> > What version of Linux are you using?
> I am using the 2.6.32 and 2.6.32-rc6 which are checked out from Sarah Sharp git
> 
> >And which scheduler?
> CFQ.
> 
> >Some people have found that the default scheduler (CFQ) leads to worse I/O
> > performance than other schedulers.  See
> > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2010-January/004970.html
> 
> This link says low performance occurs for copyng of multiple files.
> But I am always testing with single large ZIP / TAR files. Still low
> performance

The people who wrote those email messages don't know every detail about 
how the kernel works; you shouldn't believe everything they say.

You should try using a different scheduler.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux