On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 05:48:03PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > it would be better if you made calling hangup conditional on the device > > having been opened. Could you do that? > > It's the intent at least of the tty layer that calling hangup on a device > that is not open is safe. In actual fact this needs the patches I've sent > Greg a few times some of which still haven't made -next to deal with the > case of an open racing a hangup. > > Right now that isn't fixable without locking hangup v close v open > correctly, which is what the pending patch pile does. It's queued up, sorry, should get in later today. thanks, greg 'damm this real job...' k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
