On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:51:04 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ Nazarewicz wrote:
All the fsg prefixes have been replaced with msf. Moreover, functions
which lacked prefix gained msf prefix. This change has been made as
to prevent any possible name collisions when Mass Storage Function
is used with other composite functions.
Why not just add fsg to functions that don't have a prefix?
I think it would be somehow awkward if functions in Mass Storage
Function would be prefixed with fsg. That's why I decided to use
prefixes I have described in previous mails (stor, fsg and msf).
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-<m.nazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxxx>-<mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>-ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html