On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, [utf-8] MichaÅ? Nazarewicz wrote: > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:51:04 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ Nazarewicz wrote: > > > >> All the fsg prefixes have been replaced with msf. Moreover, functions > >> which lacked prefix gained msf prefix. This change has been made as > >> to prevent any possible name collisions when Mass Storage Function > >> is used with other composite functions. > > > > Why not just add fsg to functions that don't have a prefix? > > I think it would be somehow awkward if functions in Mass Storage > Function would be prefixed with fsg. That's why I decided to use > prefixes I have described in previous mails (stor, fsg and msf). IMO, having three different prefixes is more awkward than having a single slightly inappropriate prefix. If you think it might help, put a comment near the start of the file explaining that "fsg" is short for "File-backed Storage Gadget" and it is used because the function code was originally derived from the standalone gadget code. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
