On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 04:03:08AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:27:36AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > > Actually I don't, that dependency wasn't added on purpose. The code from > > otg.c is unneeded in my case. I saw no need to add to the text size. > > > > > And why can't you build this driver as a module? > > > > There is no framework in the code currently for that. So no, I didn't > > consider that. Couldn't that be fixed up later if anyone needs the > > driver as a module? > > Well, no distro wants to built it into the kernel image as 99% of their > users would not use it, right? > > So please resolve this. > > > > And do you really want this building on x86 architectures? > > > > Why not? I see no reason to forbid that? > > Is this hardware availble on x86 platforms today? I'm not sure, but the main purpose is currently embedded boards. So if I just add a dependency on the only platform where this is currently known to work, it would solve the above problem as well, right? I'll do that then. Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
