On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:53:16AM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > W dniu 14.02.2021 o 03:17, Paul Wise pisze: > > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 07:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > > All the standard benefits of the GitHub organisations feature and > > > collaborative maintenance in general > > > > Since the linux-usb GitHub organisation isn't yet available for > > collaborative maintenance of Linux userspace USB gadget projects on > > GitHub, we will create a linux-usb-gadgets GitHub organisation and can > > move gadget projects to the linux-usb org when it becomes available. > > > > Any prospects of it "becoming available"? I still fail to see what this is going to help with here. Are usb userspace projects going to somehow get loads of more developers somehow this way? What is preventing that from happening today that dumping them all in a single project going to change? Am I now somehow the arbitrator of what is, and is not, a valid project to join? We already have competing libraries scattered around, lumping them all in a single location isn't going to change that problem from what I can tell. So, what problem would this solve that the added maintenance burden by me and others would be worth it? thanks, greg k-h
