On 7/29/20 8:37 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > I see that Hans is saying that he has submitted some patch here. > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/65f27abc-69c8-3877-be5b-e5e478153af9@xxxxxxxxxx/ > But, haven't found the actual patches yet ! > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/list/?series=318719 Guenter > Thanks, > Badhri > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:03 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 7/29/20 7:28 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> Sure just sent the new patch v3. >>> >>> Patch applies cleanly on my end. So wondering what I am missing. >> >> I expected your patch to conflict with Hans' patch series. >> Maybe those are in a different tree/branch ? >> >> Guenter >> >>> Just in case if you are still noticing merge conflicts. >>> >>> Here is the git log of my local tree: >>> 633198cd2945b7 (HEAD -> usb-next-1) usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events >>> fa56dd9152ef95 (origin/usb-next) Merge tag 'usb-serial-5.9-rc1' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/johan/usb-serial into usb-next >>> 25252919a1050e xhci: dbgtty: Make some functions static >>> b0e02550346e67 xhci: dbc: Make function xhci_dbc_ring_alloc() static >>> ca6377900974c3 Revert "usb: dwc2: override PHY input signals with usb role switch support" >>> 09df709cb5aeb2 Revert "usb: dwc2: don't use ID/Vbus detection if usb-role-switch on STM32MP15 SoCs" >>> 17a82716587e9d USB: iowarrior: fix up report size handling for some devices >>> e98ba8cc3f8a89 Merge tag 'usb-for-v5.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb <http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb> into usb-next >>> c97793089b11f7 Merge 5.8-rc7 into usb-next >>> 92ed301919932f (tag: v5.8-rc7, origin/usb-linus, origin/main) Linux 5.8-rc7 >>> >>> Was comparing against https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/log/?h=usb-next >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Badhri >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:53 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:05:51PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: >>> > "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2 >>> > The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond >>> > within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the >>> > sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire." >>> > >>> > When the cpu complex is busy running other lower priority >>> > work items, TCPM's work queue sometimes does not get scheduled >>> > on time to meet the above requirement from the spec. >>> > Moving to kthread_work apis to run with real time priority. >>> > Just lower than the default threaded irq priority, >>> > MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 + 1. (Higher number implies lower priority). >>> > >>> > Further, as observed in 1ff688209e2e, moving to hrtimers to >>> > overcome scheduling latency while scheduling the delayed work. >>> > >>> > TCPM has three work streams: >>> > 1. tcpm_state_machine >>> > 2. vdm_state_machine >>> > 3. event_work >>> > >>> > tcpm_state_machine and vdm_state_machine both schedule work in >>> > future i.e. delayed. Hence each of them have a corresponding >>> > hrtimer, tcpm_state_machine_timer & vdm_state_machine_timer. >>> > >>> > When work is queued right away kthread_queue_work is used. >>> > Else, the relevant timer is programmed and made to queue >>> > the kthread_work upon timer expiry. >>> > >>> > kthread_create_worker only creates one kthread worker thread, >>> > hence single threadedness of workqueue is retained. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:badhri@xxxxxxxxxx>> >>> >>> This doesn't apply against my usb-next branch at all. >>> >>> Can you rebase and resend? >>> >>> Remember to collect the reviewed-by tags as well when you do so. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >>
