Hi Heikki, On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 05:22:51PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi Prashant, > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:57:19AM -0700, Prashant Malani wrote: > > Hi Heikki, > > > > Thanks a lot for looking into this. Kindly see my response inline: > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 04:32:02PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:18:44PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > > Hi Prashant, > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:40:41PM -0700, Prashant Malani wrote: > > > > > > +static int sbu_orientation(struct pmc_usb_port *port) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + if (port->sbu_orientation) > > > > > > + return port->sbu_orientation - 1; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return port->orientation - 1; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > +static int hsl_orientation(struct pmc_usb_port *port) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + if (port->hsl_orientation) > > > > > > + return port->hsl_orientation - 1; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + return port->orientation - 1; > > > > > > +} > > > > > > + > > > > > > static int pmc_usb_command(struct pmc_usb_port *port, u8 *msg, u32 len) > > > > > > { > > > > > > u8 response[4]; > > > > > > @@ -151,8 +170,9 @@ pmc_usb_mux_dp(struct pmc_usb_port *port, struct typec_mux_state *state) > > > > > > > > > > > > req.mode_data = (port->orientation - 1) << PMC_USB_ALTMODE_ORI_SHIFT; > > > > > > req.mode_data |= (port->role - 1) << PMC_USB_ALTMODE_UFP_SHIFT; > > > > > > - req.mode_data |= (port->orientation - 1) << PMC_USB_ALTMODE_ORI_AUX_SHIFT; > > > > > > - req.mode_data |= (port->orientation - 1) << PMC_USB_ALTMODE_ORI_HSL_SHIFT; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + req.mode_data |= sbu_orientation(port) << PMC_USB_ALTMODE_ORI_AUX_SHIFT; > > > > > > > > > > I'm curious to know what would happen when sbu-orientation == "normal". > > > > > That means |port->sbu_orientation| == 1. > > > > > > > > > > It sounds like what should happen is the AUX_SHIFT orientation > > > > > setting should follow what |port->orientation| is, but here it > > > > > looks like it will always be set to |port->sbu_orientation - 1|, i.e 0, > > > > > even if port->orientation == TYPEC_ORIENTATION_REVERSE, i.e 2, meaning > > > > > it should be set to 1 ? > > > > > > > > I'll double check this, and get back to you.. > > > > > > This is not exactly an answer to your question, but it seems that > > > those bits are only valid if "Alternate-Direct" message is used. > > > Currently the driver does not support that message. > > Could you kindly provide some detail on when "Alternate-Direct" would be > > preferred to the current method? > > Alternate Mode Direct request is supposed to be used if an alternate > mode is entered directly from disconnected state. Ack. > > > Also, is there anything on the PMC side which is preventing the use of > > "Alternate-Direct" messages? It seems like the state transition diagram > > there would be simpler, although I'm likely missing significant details > > here. > > So we actually should use the "direct" request if we are in > disconnected state to enter alt modes if I understood correctly. But > otherwise we should use the normal Alternate Mode request and not the > Alternate Mode "direct" request. And I'm afraid I don't know why. SG. > > > > I think the correct thing to do now is to remove the two lines from > > > the driver where those bits (ORI-HSL and ORI-Aux) are set. > > I see. How would orientation then be handled in a retimer configuration > > where AUX/SBU is flipped by the retimer itself? > > Note that if we send a separate "connection" request first, then we > already tell the HSL and SBU orientation as part of the payload of > that request. That is why there is no need to tell about the HSL and > SBU orientation with the normal Alternate Mode Request. > > So we have already handled the HSL and SBU orientation by the time > this function is called. Thanks for the explanation. I assume the HSL and SBU bit setting lines will be removed from pmc_usb_mux_tbt() too? Best regards, > > > thanks, > > -- > heikki