On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 11:30:11 +0100 Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 24. 01. 20 v 13:16 Pavel Hofman napsal(a): > > > > Dne 19. 01. 20 v 15:53 Pavel Hofman napsal(a): > >> > >> Dne 17. 01. 20 v 11:40 John Keeping napsal(a): > >>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:39:50 +0100 > >>> Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> I've taken a look at this and the patch below fixes it in my simple > >>>>> testing. But note that this doesn't adjust the PCM's min_period_bytes > >>>>> which will be necessary if you want to minimize latency with an > >>>>> adjusted > >>>>> high-speed bInterval setting. > >>>> > >>>> Please can I ask you to submit your patch? IMO your perhaps slightly > >>>> suboptimal solution is much better than the current broken version. > >>> > >>> Yes, the patch is definitely an improvement. I thought it would be > >>> picked up from the earlier mail, but I think Patchwork requires the > >>> subject to match, so I'm including it again here. > >>> > >>> Are you able to provide a Tested-by for this change? > >> > >> > >> Testing looks OK, thanks a lot! > >> > >> Tested-by: Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > I apologize for a basic question - please which official repository to > check status of a gadget patch after being accepted? Thanks a lot for > the information. If you have a kernel tree, you can ask the MAINTAINERS file: ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --scm -f drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c I'd expect this to appear in Felipe's tree first at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git but I don't see it yet. I guess it won't be picked up until after the merge window. Regards, John
