Dne 24. 01. 20 v 13:16 Pavel Hofman napsal(a):
Dne 19. 01. 20 v 15:53 Pavel Hofman napsal(a):
Dne 17. 01. 20 v 11:40 John Keeping napsal(a):
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:39:50 +0100
Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've taken a look at this and the patch below fixes it in my simple
testing. But note that this doesn't adjust the PCM's min_period_bytes
which will be necessary if you want to minimize latency with an
adjusted
high-speed bInterval setting.
Please can I ask you to submit your patch? IMO your perhaps slightly
suboptimal solution is much better than the current broken version.
Yes, the patch is definitely an improvement. I thought it would be
picked up from the earlier mail, but I think Patchwork requires the
subject to match, so I'm including it again here.
Are you able to provide a Tested-by for this change?
Testing looks OK, thanks a lot!
Tested-by: Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I apologize for a basic question - please which official repository to
check status of a gadget patch after being accepted? Thanks a lot for
the information.
Best regards,
Pavel.
