On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi folks ! > > It seems that f_mass_storage duplicates (well maybe predates too..) a > lot of what's in drivers/target. > > Anybody working on implementing a new version of f_mass_storage that > is layered upon drivers/target instead ? That would bring quite a lot > of additional functionality. That's what f_tcm does. Alan Stern > If not, I might look into it. > > Cheers, > Ben.