Re: f_mass_storage vs drivers/target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Hi folks !
> 
> It seems that f_mass_storage duplicates (well maybe predates too..) a
> lot of what's in drivers/target.
> 
> Anybody working on implementing a new version of f_mass_storage that
> is layered upon drivers/target instead ? That would bring quite a lot
> of additional functionality.

That's what f_tcm does.

Alan Stern

> If not, I might look into it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux