On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:38:49PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi folks ! > > It seems that f_mass_storage duplicates (well maybe predates too..) a > lot of what's in drivers/target. It predates it by a long time. > Anybody working on implementing a new version of f_mass_storage that > is layered upon drivers/target instead ? That would bring quite a lot > of additional functionality. Why is that needed? What functionality is missing that it will provide? Will it make the code simpler? > If not, I might look into it. Hey, we don't refuse patches, for cleaning stuff up, you know that :) thanks, greg k-h
