Re: f_mass_storage vs drivers/target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 10:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks !
> > 
> > It seems that f_mass_storage duplicates (well maybe predates too..)
> a
> > lot of what's in drivers/target.
> > 
> > Anybody working on implementing a new version of f_mass_storage
> that
> > is layered upon drivers/target instead ? That would bring quite a
> lot
> > of additional functionality.
> 
> That's what f_tcm does.
> 
> Alan Stern

Haha nice, I never noticed it :-)

Cheers,
Ben.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux