On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:16:12PM +0000, Schmid, Carsten wrote: > > > > > > > > 4.14.102 is still old. > > > I agree > > > > > > > > Porting a 5.1 will take a lot of effort. > > > > > > > > Then that implies you have an SoC with a few million lines of code added > > > > to the kernel, right? Nothing we can do here about that mess, you need > > > > to go ask for support from the vendor that is forcing you to use that > > > > kernel, sorry :( > > > > > > > > > > Well its at least an x86-64 based SoC. > > > > An x86 SoC should work on 5.1, what is missing there to keep it from > > functioning? Why hasn't it already been updated to 4.19.y? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > - Long term stabilisation of product. > - Concerns a product update - already in production So, you have a huge list of known bugs/vulnerabilities in that device now, yet they refuse to update. Not good :( Best of luck, greg k-h